<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mediacrit.com &#187; Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediacrit.com/category/elections/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediacrit.com</link>
	<description>a blog of news and journalism criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Does Anyone Take Andrew Breitbart Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/why-does-anyone-take-andrew-breitbart-seriously</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/why-does-anyone-take-andrew-breitbart-seriously#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart has a job to do and he does it well. Breitbart&#8217;s job is to lie and distort the truth in order to advance a right-wing agenda, embarrass liberals, and undermine the Obama administration.
Breitbart is not a journalist, researcher, or pundit.  He is a propagandist.
Read the entire post by Peter Dreier and Christopher [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/why-does-anyone-take-andrew-breitbart-seriously/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spitting, racial and gay slurs?  Just isolated instances of emotions running high</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/spitting-racial-and-gay-slurs-just-isolated-instances-of-emotions-running-high</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/spitting-racial-and-gay-slurs-just-isolated-instances-of-emotions-running-high#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kremer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the Saturday, March 20, the weekend of the historic health care vote in Congress, Tea Party protesters outside of the Capitol apparently spit on and hurled racial and gay slurs at Democratic lawmakers.  Republican Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Amy Kremer, coordinator of the Tea Party Express, both denounced the incidents, and characterized [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/spitting-racial-and-gay-slurs-just-isolated-instances-of-emotions-running-high/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manipulating the Public Agenda: Why ACORN Was in the News, and What the News Got Wrong</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/manipulating-the-public-agenda-why-acorn-was-in-the-news-and-what-the-news-got-wrong</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/manipulating-the-public-agenda-why-acorn-was-in-the-news-and-what-the-news-got-wrong#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Dreier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
A study by Christopher R. Martin, Ph.D. and Peter Dreier, Ph.D.
Using the controversy over ACORN as a case study, this report illustrates the way the media help set the agenda for public debate, and frame the way that debate is shaped. It describes how &#8220;opinion entrepreneurs&#8221; (primarily business and conservative groups and individuals) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/manipulating-the-public-agenda-why-acorn-was-in-the-news-and-what-the-news-got-wrong/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and the End of Identity Politics</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/obama-and-the-end-of-identity-politics</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/obama-and-the-end-of-identity-politics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Moyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelby Steele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
One of the most unfortunate book titles of the last year was Shelby Steele’s A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win.
The book was published in December 2007, and beginning with the Iowa caucuses the following month, Steele had to explain with increasing difficulty why Obama still wouldn’t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/obama-and-the-end-of-identity-politics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Candidates Respond to Wall Street Failures: Is Government the Problem or the Answer?</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/candidates-respond-to-wall-street-failures</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/candidates-respond-to-wall-street-failures#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.I.G.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass-Steagall Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gramm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent collapse of several investment banks on Wall Street is one of those stories that is hard to understand and easy to dismiss. But the financial meltdown tells us plenty about how a McCain or Obama administration would handle the country’s economy, and whether we will bring stability back to the financial market, or keep blindly repeating the boom-bust cycle.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/candidates-respond-to-wall-street-failures/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WE SURVIVED THE STRIKE! Of course we did.</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/we-survived-the-strike</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/we-survived-the-strike#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="128" height="96" alt="wga strike" src="http://mediacrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/1940722505_9df8a89c35.jpg" id="image87" /><br />

Back around November 5, when the Writers Guild of America first called a strike against the major entertainment studios, there were almost hysterical reports in the news media -- what are we going to do without new episodes of our favorite TV programs? Like, Omigosh! The January 25 <i>Entertainment Weekly</i> even had a special "Strike Survival Guide" issue with cover of a bearded Conan O'Brien (who, along with David Letterman, used the time off the screen to watch his facial hair grow) that boasted "67 tips to beat the entertainment dry spell."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/we-survived-the-strike/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times Endorsement of Hillary Clinton Violates Its Own Ethical Journalism Standards</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/new-york-times-endorsement</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/new-york-times-endorsement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A clear conflict of interest, or at least the appearance of one, exists.  Two of the board's 18 members are former (Bill) Clinton administration officials...The <i>Times</i> lists this biographical information on its web site, which is a good move towards transparency. But, the <i>Times</i> does not note this conflict of interest anywhere in the editorial itself, where such information would be most useful to readers. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/new-york-times-endorsement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Time for Change &#8212; In the Caucuses, Too</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/change-iowa-caucuses</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/change-iowa-caucuses#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="128" height="96" alt="obama" src="http://mediacrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/obama.JPG" id="image83" />

Before Iowans savor the successes of this year's caucuses, perhaps we should be thinking about "change," too, because the drumbeat to take away Iowa's lead position in the nominating process is much louder than in previous years.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/change-iowa-caucuses/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The News Media&#8217;s Low Standards for the High Office</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/iowa-caucuses</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/iowa-caucuses#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="128" height="91" alt="maid rite" src="http://mediacrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/maid-rite.jpg" id="image79" /></p>

It's at times frustrating to watch the national news media cover the caucus campaigning in Iowa -- as if we're all about ethanol, hogs, and loose-meat sandwiches.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/iowa-caucuses/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October Surprise?</title>
		<link>http://mediacrit.com/october-surprise</link>
		<comments>http://mediacrit.com/october-surprise#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacrit.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="83" height="96" id="image78" alt="gas station sm" src="http://mediacrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/gas_station_sm.jpg" />

I was just a bit wary of politics at play when gasoline prices topped out over $3 a gallon during the summer, then dropped more than $1 this fall. 

	I find that Iâ€™m not alone in my mistrust.  A nationwide <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20060919/1b_gasprices19.art.htm"> USA Today/Gallup Poll </a>conducted in late September found that 42 percent of Americans think â€œthe Bush Administration has deliberately manipulated the price of gasoline so that it would decrease before this fallâ€™s elections.â€  
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediacrit.com/october-surprise/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
